gpt-oss-120b
fireworks_ai · chat model
gpt-oss-120b is listed here as a chat model from fireworks_ai. This page shows simple API pricing, token limits, and capability flags so you can compare it with similar options.
Input
$0.1500 / 1M tokens
Output
$0.6000 / 1M tokens
Cached input
N/A
Context
131.1K
Quick read
Best for
Use this page when you need a fast view of cost, context size, and supported features before testing the model in your own workload.
Things to verify
Always check the provider page for discounts, cache pricing, region rules, and any model limits that may not appear in public metadata.
Pricing
| Item | Price |
|---|---|
| Input | $0.1500 / 1M tokens |
| Output | $0.6000 / 1M tokens |
| Embedding | $0.1500 / 1M tokens |
Token limits
Context window
131.1K
Max input tokens
131.1K
Max output tokens
131.1K
Max tokens
131.1K
Capabilities
| Capability | Supported |
|---|---|
| Vision | — |
| Function calling | ✅ |
| Parallel function calling | — |
| Tool choice | ✅ |
| Prompt caching | — |
| Reasoning | ✅ |
| Response schema | ✅ |
| System messages | — |
| Audio input | — |
| Audio output | — |
| Web search | — |
| PDF input | — |
| Video input | — |
Benchmarks
Most benchmark rows are attached to the base model family rather than this provider route. Open benchmark explorer
| Benchmark | Score | Metric | Scope | Checked | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AIME 2025 | 97.9% | accuracy (%) | Base model: gpt-oss-120b (gpt-oss-120b) | 2026-05-31 | Link |
| SWE-bench Verified | 62.4% | accuracy (%) | Base model: gpt-oss-120b (gpt-oss-120b) | 2026-05-31 | Link |
| Codeforces | 2622 Elo | Elo | Base model: gpt-oss-120b (gpt-oss-120b) | 2026-05-31 | Link |
| AIME 2025 (no tools) | 92.5% | Accuracy (%) | Base model: gpt-oss (gpt-oss-120b) | 2026-05-31 | Link |
| AIME 2025 (no tools) | 91.7% | Accuracy (%) | Base model: gpt-oss (gpt-oss-20b) | 2026-05-31 | Link |
| GPQA Diamond | 80.1% | Accuracy (%) | Base model: gpt-oss (gpt-oss-120b) | 2026-05-31 | Link |
| GPQA Diamond | 71.5% | Accuracy (%) | Base model: gpt-oss (gpt-oss-20b) | 2026-05-31 | Link |
| MMLU | 90.0% | Accuracy (%) | Base model: gpt-oss (gpt-oss-120b) | 2026-05-31 | Link |
| MMLU | 85.3% | Accuracy (%) | Base model: gpt-oss (gpt-oss-20b) | 2026-05-31 | Link |
| SWE-bench Verified | 62.4% | Accuracy (%) | Base model: gpt-oss (gpt-oss-120b) | 2026-05-31 | Link |
| SWE-bench Verified | 60.7% | Accuracy (%) | Base model: gpt-oss (gpt-oss-20b) | 2026-05-31 | Link |
| Codeforces (with tools) | 2622 | Elo | Base model: gpt-oss (gpt-oss-120b) | 2026-05-31 | Link |
| Codeforces (with tools) | 2516 | Elo | Base model: gpt-oss (gpt-oss-20b) | 2026-05-31 | Link |
| HealthBench | 57.6% | Score (%) | Base model: gpt-oss (gpt-oss-120b) | 2026-05-31 | Link |
| HealthBench | 42.5% | Score (%) | Base model: gpt-oss (gpt-oss-20b) | 2026-05-31 | Link |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index | 24.5 | score | Base model: gpt-oss (openai/gpt-oss-20b:free) | 2026-05-31 | Link |
| Artificial Analysis Coding Index | 18.5 | score | Base model: gpt-oss (openai/gpt-oss-20b:free) | 2026-05-31 | Link |
| Artificial Analysis Agentic Index | 27.6 | score | Base model: gpt-oss (openai/gpt-oss-20b:free) | 2026-05-31 | Link |
| GPQA Diamond | 68.8% | accuracy | Base model: gpt-oss (openai/gpt-oss-20b:free) | 2026-05-31 | Link |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 9.8% | accuracy | Base model: gpt-oss (openai/gpt-oss-20b:free) | 2026-05-31 | Link |
| IFBench | 65.1% | accuracy | Base model: gpt-oss (openai/gpt-oss-20b:free) | 2026-05-31 | Link |
| SciCode | 34.4% | accuracy | Base model: gpt-oss (openai/gpt-oss-20b:free) | 2026-05-31 | Link |
| Terminal-Bench Hard | 10.6% | accuracy | Base model: gpt-oss (openai/gpt-oss-20b:free) | 2026-05-31 | Link |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index | 33.3 | score | Base model: gpt-oss (openai/gpt-oss-120b) | 2026-05-31 | Link |
| Artificial Analysis Coding Index | 28.6 | score | Base model: gpt-oss (openai/gpt-oss-120b) | 2026-05-31 | Link |
| Artificial Analysis Agentic Index | 37.9 | score | Base model: gpt-oss (openai/gpt-oss-120b) | 2026-05-31 | Link |
Sources
| Source links | |
| Pricing data | LiteLLM model cost map |
| Synced at | 2026-05-28 |
Docs
| Official docs |
Similar models
This list is ranked by overall similarity. Use filters to emphasize the lens that matters most for the replacement you are making.
Comparing from
| Model | Cost | Input shape | Features | Context | Why it is close |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| gpt-oss-120b fireworks_ai | In $0.1500 / 1M tokens Out $0.6000 / 1M tokens | text
Output: text | Function callingTool choiceReasoningResponse schema | 131.1K | Current model Reference row |
| Model | Cost | Input shape | Features | Context | Why it is close |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| gpt-oss-120b Together AI | In $0.1500 / 1M tokens Out $0.6000 / 1M tokens | text
Output: text | Function callingTool choiceReasoningResponse schema | 131.1K | Text covered Overall 95% |
| gpt-oss-120b azure_ai | In $0.1500 / 1M tokens Out $0.6000 / 1M tokens | text
Output: text | Function callingTool choiceResponse schema | 131.1K | Text covered Overall 90% |
| glm-4p5-air fireworks_ai | In $0.2200 / 1M tokens Out $0.8800 / 1M tokens | text
Output: text | Function callingTool choiceReasoningResponse schema | 96.0K | Same provider Overall 90% |
| qwen.qwen3-235b-a22b-2507-v1:0 bedrock_converse | In $0.2200 / 1M tokens Out $0.8800 / 1M tokens | text
Output: text | Function callingTool choiceReasoning | 131.1K | Text covered Overall 87% |
| gpt-oss-20b fireworks_ai | In $0.0500 / 1M tokens Out $0.2000 / 1M tokens | text
Output: text | Function callingTool choiceReasoningResponse schema | 131.1K | Same provider Overall 87% |
| devstral-small-2505 Mistral | In $0.1000 / 1M tokens Out $0.3000 / 1M tokens | text
Output: text | Function callingTool choiceResponse schema | 128.0K | Text covered Overall 85% |
| deepseek-v3p2 fireworks_ai | In $0.5600 / 1M tokens Out $1.6800 / 1M tokens | text
Output: text | Function callingTool choiceReasoningResponse schema | 163.8K | Same provider Overall 83% |
| glm-4p5 fireworks_ai | In $0.5500 / 1M tokens Out $2.1900 / 1M tokens | text
Output: text | Function callingTool choiceReasoningResponse schema | 96.0K | Same provider Overall 81% |
| glm-4p6 fireworks_ai | In $0.5500 / 1M tokens Out $2.1900 / 1M tokens | text
Output: text | Function callingTool choiceReasoningResponse schema | 202.8K | Same provider Overall 80% |
| glm-4p7 fireworks_ai | In $0.6000 / 1M tokens Out $2.2000 / 1M tokens | text
Output: text | Function callingTool choiceReasoningResponse schema | 202.8K | Same provider Overall 80% |
| magistral-small-2506 Mistral | In $0.5000 / 1M tokens Out $1.5000 / 1M tokens | text
Output: text | Function callingTool choiceReasoningResponse schema | 40.0K | Text covered Overall 77% |
| magistral-small-latest Mistral | In $0.5000 / 1M tokens Out $1.5000 / 1M tokens | text
Output: text | Function callingTool choiceReasoningResponse schema | 40.0K | Text covered Overall 77% |
| Phi-3-small-128k-instruct azure_ai | In $0.1500 / 1M tokens Out $0.6000 / 1M tokens | text
Output: text | Tool choice | 4.1K | Text covered Overall 67% |
| Phi-3-small-8k-instruct azure_ai | In $0.1500 / 1M tokens Out $0.6000 / 1M tokens | text
Output: text | Tool choice | 4.1K | Text covered Overall 67% |
| gpt-4o-mini Azure | In $0.1500 / 1M tokens Out $0.6000 / 1M tokens | text image
Output: text | Function callingTool choiceResponse schema | 16.4K | Text covered Overall 62% |
| command-r cohere_chat | In $0.1500 / 1M tokens Out $0.6000 / 1M tokens | text
Output: unknown | Function callingTool choice | 4.1K | Partial I/O overlap Overall 33% Missing text |
| command-r-08-2024 cohere_chat | In $0.1500 / 1M tokens Out $0.6000 / 1M tokens | text
Output: unknown | Function callingTool choice | 4.1K | Partial I/O overlap Overall 33% Missing text |
No models match this filter.